Eskuad vs Autodesk Construction Cloud: In-Depth Comparison
Eskuad is a flexible and robust field data platform. The section below compares it to Autodesk Construction Cloud, highlighting key advantages for teams that require extreme reliability and no-code simplicity.
Feature |
Eskuad |
Autodesk Construction Cloud |
Core Focus |
Field Data Platform & Mobile Form Builder for challenging environments1 |
Unified Construction Project Management1 |
Key Differentiators |
Magiksync (intelligent offline sync & battery opt.), Field-born, No-code form builder, User-centric, Affordable1 |
Comprehensive construction lifecycle, BIM integration, Document control1 |
Offline Capabilities |
Excellent (Magiksync: intelligent, battery-optimized, seamless) 41 |
Good (Document access, some field data) 131 |
Target User/Industry |
Field workers in Natural Resources, Logistics, Defense, Manufacturing, Healthcare1 |
General Contractors, Specialty Trades, Designers, Owners in Construction1 |
Pricing Model |
First ($0), Starter ($125/squad/mo), Pro ($1,300/squad/mo), Enterprise ($4,500/squad/mo)1 |
Tiered, module-based (e.g., Docs from $500/yr, Build from $1,625/yr) 171 |
When Eskuad is a better fit than Autodesk
If you need these features you should be using Eskuad
- Superior offline sync: Magiksync keeps data safe even during extended outages, outperforming Autodesk’s document-centric methods.1
- No-code ease: Eskuad forms are built without code, cutting IT dependencies and speeding up process digitization.1
- Field-born focus: Built for hostile environments, Eskuad prioritizes glove-friendly UX and battery optimization.1
- Transparent pricing: First ($0) to Enterprise ($4,500/squad/mo) delivers lower TCO compared with Autodesk.1