Eskuad vs Autodesk Construction Cloud: In-Depth Comparison

Eskuad is a flexible and robust field data platform. The section below compares it to Autodesk Construction Cloud, highlighting key advantages for teams that require extreme reliability and no-code simplicity.

 

Feature

Eskuad

Autodesk Construction Cloud

Core Focus

Field Data Platform & Mobile Form Builder for challenging environments1

Unified Construction Project Management1

Key Differentiators

Magiksync (intelligent offline sync & battery opt.), Field-born, No-code form builder, User-centric, Affordable1

Comprehensive construction lifecycle, BIM integration, Document control1

Offline Capabilities

Excellent (Magiksync: intelligent, battery-optimized, seamless) 41

Good (Document access, some field data) 131

Target User/Industry

Field workers in Natural Resources, Logistics, Defense, Manufacturing, Healthcare1

General Contractors, Specialty Trades, Designers, Owners in Construction1

Pricing Model

First ($0), Starter ($125/squad/mo), Pro ($1,300/squad/mo), Enterprise ($4,500/squad/mo)1

Tiered, module-based (e.g., Docs from $500/yr, Build from $1,625/yr) 171

When Eskuad is a better fit than Autodesk
If you need these features you should be using Eskuad

  • Superior offline sync: Magiksync keeps data safe even during extended outages, outperforming Autodesk’s document-centric methods.1

  • No-code ease: Eskuad forms are built without code, cutting IT dependencies and speeding up process digitization.1

  • Field-born focus: Built for hostile environments, Eskuad prioritizes glove-friendly UX and battery optimization.1

  • Transparent pricing: First ($0) to Enterprise ($4,500/squad/mo) delivers lower TCO compared with Autodesk.1

Try Eskuad today